Private Personalized AI agent with XTrace

5 min read

What is an AI agent?

An AI agent is an autonomous software entity designed to perform tasks by perceiving its environment, processing information, and taking actions to achieve specific goals. An AI agent typically comprises three core components:

  1. Intelligence: The large language model (LLM) that drives the agent’s cognitive capabilities, enabling it to understand and generate human-like text. This component is usually guided by a system prompt that defines the agent’s goals and the constraints it must follow.
  2. Knowledge: The domain-specific expertise and data that the agent leverages to make informed decisions and take action. Agents utilize this knowledge base as context, drawing on past experiences and relevant data to guide their choices.
  3. Tools: A suite of specialized tools that extend the agent’s abilities, allowing it to efficiently handle a variety of tasks. These tools can include API calls, executable code, or other services that enable the agent to complete its assigned tasks.

What are the three core components of an AI agent?

Correct! Wrong!

What is RAG?

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is an AI technique that enhances large language models (LLMs) by integrating relevant information from external knowledge bases. Through semantic similarity calculations, RAG retrieves document chunks from a vector database, where these documents are stored as vector representations. This process reduces the generation of factually incorrect content, significantly improving the reliability of LLM outputs.\cite{RAG}

A RAG system consists of two core components: the vector database and the retriever. The vector database holds document chunks in vector form, while the retriever calculates semantic similarity between these chunks and user queries. The more similar a chunk is to the query, the more relevant it is considered, and it is then included as context for the LLM. This setup allows RAG to dynamically update an LLM’s knowledge base without the need for retraining, effectively addressing knowledge gaps in the model’s training data.

The RAG pipeline operates by augmenting a user’s prompt with the most relevant retrieved text. The retriever fetches the necessary information from the vector database and injects it into the prompt, providing the LLM with additional context. This process not only enhances the accuracy and relevance of responses but also makes RAG a crucial technology in enabling AI agents to work with real-time data, making them more adaptable and effective in practical applications.

How does Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) improve LLM responses?

Correct! Wrong!

What is Agent Memory?

AI agents, by default, are designed to remember only the current workflow, with their memory typically constrained by a maximum token limit. This means they can retain context temporarily within a session, but once the session ends or the token limit is reached, the context is lost. Achieving long-term memory across workflows—and sometimes even across different users or organizations—requires a more sophisticated approach. This involves explicitly committing important information to memory and retrieving it when needed.

Agent Memory with blockchain:

XTrace  – A Secure AI Agent Knowledge & Memory Protocol for Collective Intelligence – will leverage blockchain as the permission and integrity layer for agent memory, ensuring that only the agent’s owner has access to stored knowledge. Blockchain is especially useful for this long persistent storage as XTrace provides commitment proof for the integrity of both the data layer and integrity of the retrieval process. The agent memory will be securely stored within XTrace’s privacy-preserving RAG framework, enabling privacy, portability and sharability. This approach provides several key use cases:

Stateful Decentralized Autonomous Agents:

  • XTrace can act as a reliable data availability layer for autonomous agents operating within Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs). Even if a TEE instance goes offline or if users want to transfer knowledge acquired by the agents, they can seamlessly spawn new agents with the stored network, ensuring continuity and operational resilience.

XTrace Agent Collaborative Network:

  • XTrace enables AI agents to access and inherit knowledge from other agents within the network, fostering seamless collaboration and eliminating redundant processing. This shared memory system allows agents to collectively improve decision-making and problem-solving capabilities without compromising data ownership or privacy.

XTrace Agent Sandbox Test:

  • XTrace provides a secure sandbox environment for AI agent developers to safely test and deploy their agents. This sandbox acts as a honeypot to detect and mitigate prompt injection attacks before agents are deployed in real-world applications. Users can define AI guardrails within XTrace, such as restricting agents from mentioning competitor names, discussing political topics, or leaking sensitive key phrases. These guardrails can be enforced through smart contracts, allowing external parties to challenge the agents with potentially malicious prompts. If a prompt successfully bypasses the defined safeguards, the smart contract can trigger a bounty release, incentivizing adversarial testing. Unlike conventional approaches, XTrace agents retain memory of past attack attempts, enabling them to autonomously learn and adapt to new threats over time. Following the sandbox testing phase, agents carry forward a comprehensive memory of detected malicious prompts, enhancing their resilience against similar attacks in future deployments.

How to create a Personalized AI agent?

To create an AI agent with XTrace, there are three main steps to follow:

  1. Define the Purpose: Determine the specific tasks and goals the agent will accomplish.
  2. Choose the AI Model: Select a suitable LLM or other machine learning models that align with the agent’s requirements.
  3. Gather and Structure Knowledge: Collect domain-specific data and organize it in a way that the agent can efficiently use.
  4. Develop Tools and Integrations: Incorporate APIs, databases, or other services that the agent may need to interact with.

How to create a Private Personalized AI agent with XTrace?

XTrace can serve as the data connection layer between the user and the AI agents. Users will be able to securely share data from various apps into the system to create an AI agent that is aware of the user’s system. By leveraging XTrace’s encrypted storage and access control mechanisms, AI agents can be personalized without compromising user privacy. Key features include:

  1. Seamless Data Integration: Aggregating data from multiple sources securely.
  2. Granular Access Control: Ensuring only authorized AI agents can access specific data.
  3. Privacy-Preserving Computation: Enabling AI agents to learn from user data without exposing it.
  4. Automated Insights: Leveraging AI to provide personalized recommendations based on securely stored data.
  5. User Ownership: Empowering users with full control over their data and how it is used.

How do we use XTrace private RAG for (L)Earn AI🕺?

  1. We send learning materials in LLM friendly format to LNC RAG at XTrace
    send-to-rag
  2. Once (L)Earn AI🕺 gets the question, first it talks to private RAG and retrieve relevant information
    learn-ai-private-rag-300x105
  3. The LLM hosted at NEAR AI infrastructure generates a response based on both its pre-trained knowledge and the retrieved information!
    learn-ai-private-rag-feedback-300x214
  4. Learners are encouraged to provide feedback and get 4nLEARNs to improve (L)Earn AI🕺 to work better for NEAR community!
13

188 thoughts on “Private Personalized AI agent with XTrace”

  1. enab.near (8 nL)

    I'm excited to see how XTrace private RAG is being utilized to enhance the (L)Earn AI experience! The idea of sending learning materials in an LLM-friendly format to the RAG and then retrieving relevant information to inform AI responses is genius. I'm curious to know more about the type of feedback learners are encouraged to provide and how that feedback is used to improve the AI. Is there a way to track the progress and effectiveness of the 4nLEARNs system? Additionally, how does the NEAR community plan to expand the capabilities of (L)Earn AI in the future?

    Show replies
  2. puzz.near (8 nL)

    This explanation of how XTrace private RAG is used for (L)Earn AI is fascinating! I love how the process involves a seamless collaboration between the LNC RAG, private RAG, and the LLM hosted on NEAR AI infrastructure. The fact that learners can provide feedback and earn 4nLEARNs to improve the AI is a great incentive to encourage community engagement. I'm curious to know more about how the feedback mechanism works and how it impacts the AI's performance over time. Can anyone share more insights on this?

    Show replies
  3. kilil.near (0 nL)

    This is a game-changer! With XTrace, I can finally have a personalized AI agent that truly understands me without compromising my privacy. The seamless data integration feature is a major selling point, as I've always struggled to keep my various apps and devices connected. I'm also impressed by the granular access control and privacy-preserving computation features, which ensure that my data is protected while still allowing my AI agent to learn from it. But what I'm most excited about is the user ownership aspect – it's about time we take back control of our own data! Can't wait to see this technology in action and explore its potential applications.

    Show replies
  4. Fascinating to see how RAG is revolutionizing the field of AI language models! By integrating external knowledge bases and reducing factually incorrect content, RAG has the potential to significantly improve the reliability and accuracy of LLM outputs. I'm particularly intrigued by the dynamic updating of the knowledge base without retraining, which could be a game-changer for real-time applications. However, I do wonder about the potential limitations of RAG – how does it handle ambiguous or contradictory information in the vector database? And how can we ensure that the external knowledge sources are trustworthy and unbiased?

    Show replies
  5. nubee.near (0 nL)

    Fascinating breakdown of the AI agent's core components! I'm still wrapping my head around the potential implications of these autonomous software entities. One question that comes to mind is, how do we ensure the system prompts guiding the intelligence component are unbiased and aligned with human values? Moreover, as these agents operate with increasing autonomy, what measures can be put in place to prevent potential misuse of their capabilities? The knowledge and tools components seem crucial in shaping the agent's actions, but accountability and transparency are essential for building trust in these systems.

    Show replies
  6. comev.near (0 nL)

    This explanation of RAG really clarifies its potential to revolutionize the output of large language models. I'm particularly intrigued by the dynamic updating of an LLM's knowledge base without retraining, which could significantly reduce the time and resources spent on model updates. A question that comes to mind is, how does RAG handle conflicting or outdated information in the vector database, and what mechanisms are in place to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the retrieved chunks? Additionally, I'd love to see more exploration of RAG's applications in real-world scenarios, such as customer service chatbots or news reporting, to fully understand its potential impact.

    Show replies
  7. bnyt.near (0 nL)

    Fascinating insights on creating a personalized AI agent with XTrace! I completely agree that defining the purpose and choosing the right AI model are crucial steps. However, I'm curious to know more about the 'Gather and Structure Knowledge' stage. How does one ensure that the collected data is not only domain-specific but also up-to-date and unbiased? Moreover, what kind of tools and integrations are typically required to enable seamless interactions between the agent and other services? Can't wait to dive deeper into these details and explore the possibilities of personalized AI agents!

    Show replies
  8. kitas.near (0 nL)

    I think the key to creating a truly effective personalized AI agent lies in the first step: defining the purpose. It's easy to get caught up in the excitement of selecting a cutting-edge AI model, but if we don't have a clear understanding of what we want the agent to achieve, we risk creating a solution that's clever but irrelevant. I've seen projects falter because they failed to identify the specific tasks and goals of the agent. By taking the time to carefully define the purpose, we can ensure that our AI agent is tailored to meet the needs of its users and provides real value. What are some common pitfalls people face when trying to define the purpose of their AI agent?

    Show replies
  9. bioy.near (0 nL)

    Wow, the potential of RAG is enormous! I'm particularly excited about its ability to dynamically update an LLM's knowledge base without retraining, which could have a huge impact on keeping AI models informed about rapidly changing fields like science, technology, and current events. I'm curious, though – how does RAG handle conflicting or outdated information in the external knowledge bases? And what kind of quality control measures are in place to ensure the reliability of the retrieved document chunks? Looking forward to seeing more developments in this area!

    Show replies
  10. effo.near (0 nL)

    I'm really intrigued by the concept of creating a personalized AI agent with XTrace. The step-by-step approach outlined here seems straightforward, but I'm curious to know more about how to determine the suitable AI model in step 2. Are there any specific factors to consider when choosing between different LLMs or machine learning models? Additionally, how does one ensure that the domain-specific data collected in step 3 is accurate and unbiased? These seem like crucial decisions that could greatly impact the effectiveness of the agent. Anyone have any experience or insights to share on this?

    Show replies
  11. viore.near (0 nL)

    This explanation of AI agents sheds light on the complexity and potential of autonomous software entities. I'm intrigued by the interplay between the three core components – intelligence, knowledge, and tools. It makes me wonder how these components are weighted in different AI applications, and whether there's a risk of bias if the system prompt guiding the intelligence component is flawed. Additionally, I'd love to know more about how AI agents are being used in real-world scenarios, such as customer service or healthcare, and what kind of results they're producing. Are there any success stories or challenges that can be shared?

    Show replies
  12. This concept of Agent Memory really highlights the limitations of current AI systems. It's concerning that they can only retain context temporarily, making it difficult to build trust and consistency in interactions. I'm curious, how do you envision achieving long-term memory across workflows and users? Would it involve integrating external databases or developing more advanced natural language processing capabilities? Moreover, what kind of information would be deemed 'important' enough to commit to memory, and who would have control over what gets stored and retrieved?

    Show replies

Leave a Comment


To leave a comment you should to:


Scroll to Top